Developing a Sustainability Auditing Model in the Retail Industry

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Associate Prof., Department of Accounting, Faculty of Accounting and Financial Sciences, College of Management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

10.22059/jibm.2025.395678.4982

Abstract

Objective
Sustainability auditing is a systematic and independent process for evaluating an organization's performance in various areas of sustainability, including environmental, social, and economic aspects. The purpose of this type of audit is to identify the organization's strengths and weaknesses in these areas, provide solutions to improve performance, and ensure compliance with legal requirements and international standards. This qualitative research aims to present a sustainability audit model in the retail industry.
 
Methodology
This study applies the Cranhelm and Gold-Kohl multiple-database method. Its participants include academic experts in auditing and accounting, as well as representatives from private-sector retail companies, selected through a theoretical sampling method. A semi-structured interview approach was employed to identify the key categories of the sustainability audit model within the retail industry. Using this method, in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 auditing and accounting experts, through which the necessary data were collected.
 
Findings
In this study, five categories (central category, individual and organizational support platforms, economic and social contexts, individual and occupational and organizational barriers, individual and organizational outcomes and consequences) and 25 concepts were extracted in the inductive coding stage. Then, conceptual refinement, pattern coding (model presentation), theoretical adaptation of the model, empirical validation and evaluation of theoretical coherence of the model and theory enrichment were described.
 
Conclusion
One of the primary reasons for the necessity of sustainability auditing in companies is its potential to identify operational inefficiencies and generate financial savings. Sustainability auditing can identify opportunities to save energy, reduce waste, and save water. By implementing changes aimed at reducing their environmental impact, companies can lower utility expenses and decrease overall operating costs. Also, sustainability auditing can help companies maintain their social license to operate. Consumers are aware of the effects of their purchasing decisions on the environment and society. By improving their sustainability practices, companies can enhance their reputation and build trust with customers, employees, and other stakeholders.

Keywords

Main Subjects


 
References
Amina, B. & Esra, S. A. (2018). The Relationship between Audit Committee Characteristics and the Level of Sustainability Report Disclosure. 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2018, Kuwait City, Kuwait, October 30 – November 1, 2018, Proceedings. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02131-3_44.
Amjad, F., Abbas, W., Zia-URRehman, M., Baig, S, A., Hashim, M., Khan, A., Rehman, H. (2021). Effect of green human resource management practices on organizational sustainability: the mediating role of environmental and employee performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(3), 28191- 28206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 020-11307-9
Anvarkhatibi, S., Baradaran Hassanzadeh, R., Mottaghi, A. & Taghizadeh, H. (2019). Review the Effect of audit quality from the perspective of different groups on financial reporting quality. Journal of Management Accounting and Auditing Knowledge, 8(31), 245-260.
(in Persian)
Appuhami, R. & Tashakor, S. (2017). The impact of audit committee characteristics on CSR disclosure: An analysis of Australian firms. Australian Accounting Review, 27(4), 400-420.
Auerbach & Silverstein, L.B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis. New York University, New York.
Badolato, P. G., Donelson, D. C. & Ege, M. (2014). Audit committee financial expertise and earnings management: The role of status. Journal of accounting and economics, 58(2-3), 208-230.
Bahmani, A, Aghaei, R. & Aghaei, M. (2016). A study of the state of the retail industry (case study: emphasis on chain stores in Iran).  Commercial Surveys, 14(77), 55-67. (in Persian)
Balugani, E., Butturi, M. A., Chevers, D., Parker, D. & Rimini, B. (2020). Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Resilience and Sustainability on Firms’ Performance. Sustainability, 12(5), 1742.
Bilal, B., Chen, S. & Komal, B. (2018). Audit committee financial expertise and earnings quality: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research84, 253-270.
Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Brotherton, M. C. & Bernard, J. (2019). Ethical issues in the assurance of sustainability reports: Perspectives from assurance providers. Journal of Business Ethics, 159(4), 1111-1125. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3840-3
Bromideh, A. A., Alefpour Tarakameh, M., Nazari, S. & Aghaei, M. (2024). Common Tactics of Customer Deception in Chain Stores: A Model of Customer Deception Tree. Journal of Business Management, 16(4), 1029-1054. doi: 10.22059/jibm.2023.357967.4570
(in Persian)
Buallay, A. & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249-264. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-06-2018-0085
Carp, M., Păvăloaia, L., Afrăsinei, M. B. & Georgescu, I. E. (2019). Is sustainability reporting a business strategy for firm’s growth? Empirical study on the Romanian capital market. Sustainability, 11(3), 658. doi:10.3390/ su11030658
Danaeifard, H. & Emami, M. (2013). Data-Based Theory Strategy in Organization and Management Studies. (Chapter 4 of the book Qualitative Research Methodology in Management: A Comprehensive Approach) (Second Edition), Tehran: Saffar Publications. (in Persian)
Ergene, S., Calás, M, B., Smircich, L. (2017). Ecologies of Sustainable Concerns: Organization Theorizing for the Anthropocene. Gender, Work & Organization, 28(3), 222-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12189
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Transaction.
Goldkuhl, G. & Cronholm, S. (2010). Adding theoretical grounding to grounded theory: Toward multi-grounded theory. International journal of qualitative methods, 9(2), 187-205.
Hassas Yeganeh, Y. & Barzegar, Gh. (2015). A model for disclosing corporate social responsibility and sustainability and its current status in companies listed on the Iranian Stock Exchange. Quarterly Journal of the Iranian Stock Exchange, 8(29), 91-110.
(in Persian)
Hörisch, J., Schaltegger, S. & Freeman, R.E. (2020). Integrating stakeholder theory and sustainability accounting: A conceptual synthesis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275(10), 32-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020. 124097
Hsiao, P. C. K., de Villiers, C., Horner, C. & Oosthuizen, H. (2022). A review and synthesis of contemporary sustainability accounting research and the development of a research agenda. Accounting & Finance, 62(4), 4453-4483. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12936
Karajeh, A. I. & Ibrahim, M. Y. B. (2017). Impact of audit committee on the association between financial reporting quality and shareholder value. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(3), 14-19.
Khaki, Gh. (2018). Research Method in Management. Tehran: Islamic Azad University Publishing Center. (in Persian)
Korte, B. (2023). Retail Statistics for 2023: Trends, Consumer Outlook & Technology, Fit Small Business, Published September 25, 2023, (Accessed on 15 Oct 2023 at: https://fitsmallbusiness.com/retail-statistics/).
Lin, W, L., Ho, J, A., Lee, C. & Ng, S, I. (2020). Impact of positive and negative corporate social responsibility on automotive firms’ financial performance: A market-based asset perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1761-1773. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1923. [Online][04 March 2020].
Lozano, R., Barreiro-Gen, M., Zafar, A. (2021). Collaboration for organizational sustainability limits to growth: Developing a factors, benefits, and challenges framework. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 728-737. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2170
Malik, A., Egan, M., Du Plessis, M., Lenzen, M. (2021). Managing sustainability using financial accounting data: The value of inputoutput analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 293(13), 81-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126128
Moldavska, A. & Welo, T. (2017). The concept of sustainable manufacturing and its definitions: A content-analysis based literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 166, 744-755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.006
Najmadini, N., Dasineh, M., Khodadady, D. & Rostami Jazz, H. (2022). Evluating the Effectiveness of Sustainability Accounting based on Green Human Resource Functions. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 24(9), 43-57. (in Persian)
Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A. & Hejazi, E. (2019). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences (5th edition), Tehran: Agah Publications. (in Persian)
Stacchezzini, R., Melloni, G. & Lai, A. (2016). Sustainability management and reporting: the role of integrated reporting for communicating corporate sustainability management. Journal of cleaner production, 136, 102-110.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1998). Basic of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications
Torabi, A. & Esmaeilzadeh, A. (2015). The Impact of Sustainability Accounting on Company Survival (Case Study: Automotive Industries). Third International Conference on Applied Research in Management and Accounting. (in Persian)
Zimon, G., Arianpoor, A. & Salehi, M. (2022). Sustainability reporting and corporate reputation: the moderating effect of CEO opportunistic behavior. Sustainability, 14(3), 1257. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14031257