مدلی برای تبیین هوشمندی در شرکت‌های هولدینگ

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشکدة مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به نقش کلیدی بنگاه‌های مادر در هدایت کسب‌وکارهای تابعه و حجم عظیم سرمایه‌های تحت مدیریت، اشراف بر تحولات محیط بیرونی در کنار درک کافی از کسب‌وکارهای تابعه نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در موفقیت کلی گروه دارد. درنتیجه، این ضرورت احساس می‌شود که مطالعات حوزة هوشمندی- که از دیرباز بر شرکت‌های تک‌کسب‌وکاره متمرکز بود- باید اکنون در تطابق با اقتضائات محیطی شرکت‌های مادر و نیازهای اطلاعاتی آنها ظهور یابد که در این پژوهش با عنوان هوش مادری یا هوشمندی بنگاه مادر معرفی شده است و شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های آن مدنظر است. جامعة آماری پژوهش را در بخش کیفی، خبرگان دانشگاهی و اجرایی و در بخش کمی، مدیران و کارشناسان شرکت‌های هولدینگ و دیگر افراد مطلع تشکیل می‌دهند. در بخش کیفی از روش تحلیل محتوا و در بخش کمی از تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده شد. درنهایت، نتایج تحقیق وجود 33 مؤلفة مؤثر بر ایجاد هوش مادری را در قالب شش گروه (عامل) تأیید کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A model describing intelligence in parent companies

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abdollah Asadzadeh 1
  • Hossein Rahmanseresht 2
1 Allame Tabatabaee University
2 Allame Tabatabaee University
چکیده [English]

Due to key role of parent companies in directing subsidiaries and their huge under-management investments, awareness of changes in external environment as well as sufficient feel of subsidiaries are very crucial in group overall success. So it is essential that the research area of intelligence which was conventionally centralized around single-business companies emerges this time with regard to parent companies environmental implications and their interrelated information needs called in this article as Parental Intelligence or Corporate Parent Intelligence which studying its dimensions and elements are targeted here. The population of the study in qualitative segment includes academics and executive proficients and in quantitative segment includes experts and managers of parent companies and other knowledgeable individuals. The qualitative method used is content analysis and confirmatory factor analysis is exploited in quantitative area. The results of research ultimately confirmed 32 elements in 6 groups contributing to Parental Intelligence.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Competitive intelligence
  • Corporate Parent
  • Environmental Intelligence
  • Holding company
  • Parental Intelligence

مراجع

1. Ansoff, H. I. (1957). Strategies for diversifications, Harvard Business Review, 35(5): 113- 124.
2. Arabi, S. M. & Izadi, D. (2002). Fundamentals of strategic management, Cultural Research Center Press, Tehran. (In Persian)
3. Bose, R. (2009). Advanced analytics: opportunities and challenges, Industrial Management & Data Systems,109(2): 155- 172.
4. Breeding, B. (2000). CI and KM converge: A case study at Shell Services International, Competitive Intelligence Review, 11(4): 12- 24.
5. Cavalcanti, E. P. (2005). The Relationship between Business Intelligence and Business Success, Journal of Competitive Intelligence and Management, 3(1): 6- 15.
6. Chandler, A. D. (1991). The Functions of the HQ Unit in the Multi business Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 12(1): 31- 50.
7. Collis D. J., Young, D. & Goold, M. (2007). The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters, Strategic Management Journal, 28(4): 383– 405.
8. Davis, M. (2004). using business intelligence for competitive advantage, Available at: www.knowledgepoint.com.au/business_intelligence/Articles/BI_MD001b.htm.
9. Ding, L. (2009). Analysis on the competitive intelligence in business management, 2nd international symposium on information science and engineering, IEEE, 327- 330.
10. Duncan, R. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environment and perceived environment uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3): 313- 327.
11. Fleisher, C. S. & Blenkhorn, D. L. (2003). Controversies in competitive intelligence: the enduring issues, Praeger Publishers, Westport.
12. Frishammar, J. (2002). Characteristics in Information Processing Approaches, International Journal of Information Management, 22(2): 143- 156.
13. Goleman, D. (2009). Ecological intelligence: How knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything, Broadway Business, New York.
14. Goold, M. & Campbell, A. (1998). Desperately Seeking Synergy, Harvard Business Review, 76(5): 131- 143.
15. Goold, M. & Quinn, J. (1990). Strategic control: Milestones for long-term performance, Hutchinson, London.
16. Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1995). Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage, Harvard Business Review, 73(2): 120- 132.
17. Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1994). Corporate level strategy: Creating value in the multi business company, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
18. Goold, M., Campbell, A. & Alexander, M. (1998). Corporate strategy and parenting theory-briefcase, Long Range Planning, 31(2): 308- 314.
19. Iran Securities and Exchange Organization. (2012). parent companies (holding), Retrieved from http://www.seo.ir/Page/FL_m8FfxQbPRuNAJ-fcBpg==/هلدینگ/شرکتهای-مادر-(هلدینگ). (In Persian)
20. Jaworski, B. & Liang, C. W. (1993). Competitive intelligence: Creating value for the organization, Final Report on Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP) Sponsored Research, Vienna: SCIP.
21. Johnson, G. & Scholes, K. (2002). Exploring corporate strategy, Prentice Hall, London.
22. Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (2000) Strategy focused organization, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
23. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd edition, Guilford Press, NY.
24. Kruehler, M. & Pidun, U. (2011). Parenting approaches in corporate strategy: An exploratory study on the impact of portfolio structure and culture, Schmalenbach Business Review, 3(1): 69- 91.
25. Kruehler, M., Pidun, U. & Rubner, H. (2012). How to assess the corporate parenting strategy? A conceptual answer, Journal of Business Strategy, 33(4): 4- 17.
26. Maggioni, I. & Ricciardi, F. (2012). Business Intelligence for Supply Chain Management: Trends from Scholarly Literature and from the World of Practice, Information Systems: Crossroads for Organization, Management, Accounting and Engineering, Heidelberg: PhysicaVerlag.
27. Moravveji, Gh. (2002). A framework for designing information systems of senior managers for Iranian corporate parents,Master Thesis, Tarbiat Modarres University. (In Persian)
28. Moridi, S. (2002). The Culture of business management, Industrial Management Organization, Tehran. (In Persian)
29. Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. (1982). In Search of Excellence: Lessons from America’s Best-Run Companies, Harper & Row, New York.
30. Peyrot, M., Childs, N., Van Doren, D. & Allen, K. (2002). An empirically-based model of competitor intelligence use, Journal of Business Research, 55(9): 747- 758.
31. Porter, M. E. (1987). From competitive advantage to corporate strategy, Harvard Business Review, 65(3): 43- 59.
32. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G. (1990). The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, 90 (3): 79- 91.
33. Prescott, J. E. & Gibbons, P. T. (1992). The Parallel Process of Competitive Intelligence: Why it exists and what we can do about it, Competitive Intelligence Review, 3(2): 11- 13.
34. Proff, H. (2002). Business unit strategies between regionalization and globalization, International Business Review, 11(2): 231– 250.
35. Rahmanseresht, H. (2005). Management strategies, Ideh Pardazan-e Fan Va Honar, Tehran. (In Persian)
36. Rahmanseresht, H. & Fathollahi, A. (2011). A model for selecting parenting style for subsidiaries by corporate parent from Resource Based View, Quarterly journal of business management, Tehran University, 3(8): 81- 100. (In Persian)
37. Rezaeiyan, A. & Lashgar Bolooki, M. (2010). Competitive intelligence and strategic decisions, Quarterly Journal of Business Management Vision, Shahid Beheshti University, 2(35): 43- 65. (In Persian)
38. Sobhanollahi, M. A., Rahmanseresht, H. & Asli beygi, F. (2012). A model of strategic interaction at holding companies, Quarterly Journal of Strategic Management Studies, Shahid Beheshti University, 12: 15- 42. (In Persian)
39. Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals (SCIP). (2008). Resources: Language of BI. Available            at: www.scip.org/content.cfm?itemnumber ¼ 2226& navItemNumber ¼ 2227.
40. Tanriverdi, H. & Venkatraman, N. (2005). Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multi business firms, Strategic Management Journal, 26(2): 97- 119.
41. Van Oijen, A. & Douma, S. (2000). Diversification strategy and the roles of the centre, Long Range Planning, 33(4): 560- 578.
42. Williamson, O. E. (1975), Markets and hierarchies: Analysis and antitrust implications, Free Press, New York.
43. Wright, S. & Calof, J. (2006). Business and Marketing Intelligence, Journal of Competitive Intelligence, 40(5): 453- 465.
44. Wright, S., Pickton, D. & Callow, J. (2002). Competitive intelligence in UK firms: A typology, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 22(6): 349- 360.
45. Zhang, X., Majid, S. & Foo, S. (2010). Environment scanning: An application of information literacy skills at the workplace, Journal of Information Science, 36(6): 719- 732.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار